![]() I don't do video editing at all, nor do I have a desire to do so. In December, I got rid of the w3580 for the w3680 at 700.00 dollars in late Dec-early Jan 2011.Īnd now I am at odds about further expanding this thing as I now realize that the 6-core monster I have and all I did to get the "latest and greatest" is now at a stand still. then in September and October made the jump and for 300.00 bought the 2010 backplane board and processor board - my transition to a 2010 westmere was complete. at the time it was 2349.00 - 1950.00 = 400 bucks for a 2009 refurb.Īs if THAT wasn't enough. and then finally got the 2009 4,1 mac pro refurb from Apple. I sold that for 1950.00 to a private individual in July 2010. Then once I sold the I then jumped up to the 3.00 ghz Harpertown 3,1 mac pro. My 2006 was a used mac pro though didn't keep it too long, once I found out about the EFI 32/64 thingy because at the time I wanted to run windows 7 64-bit on it. Used Mac Pros aren't the most reliable things in the world either, sadly.Įlaborate on that. I'd prefer the mobile phone could play all media, including flash, so Apple drives me to look elsewhere for my replacements, at the moment. In the phone market, it HAS to work flawlessly as a phone, and it's nice to be able to launch my planes in Airline Manager during a break at work, along with reading the forums. I would rather read a paper book for reading, and use a real laptop for mobile computing. At least I don't have to reboot, even though I do shut down nightly.Īll this dark and shifty action on Apple's part, however, has convinced me that when the current equipment needs replacing, I'll most certainly look long and hard at the Android market, along with Windows 7 (or 8, whatever they have next.)Īs some have said, I agree that the consumer drives the market and the products. AT&T works great in Denver, and it's rare for a program to crash on my Mac. July of last year, I got an iPhone 3GS, and then in December, I got a new Mac Pro. (The Zen only held 20 gigs.) It worked almost flawlessly (and is still my main portable player!) despite my loathe of iTunes and the way it screws with my organization. I had Creative mp3 players that worked perfectly fine, but decided to give the iPod Photo (the first one with a nifty color screen) a try because it held 60 gigs, which was about half my music collection at the time. and was always curious about the "other side" for a long time. Well, I was all about building PCs and Windows-based software for years. I had it set to Allow and yet it once went to Block on its own somehow.) (Also check your OS X Firewall for EyeTV stuff set to Block. Will try again tomorrow.ĮDIT2: It came back when I downloaded a newer build-link near the end of this page: Nothing has changed since earlier when it was fine. It doesn't work anymore (not even on LAN). And my rabbit ears!ĮDIT: I just HAD to open my yap. ![]() All my ports are working again today, and I can confirm that EyeTV + works for TV-watching over WAN :) Too cool. Yep-must have been an AT&T issue of some kind. I'll try again tomorrow in the hopes that it's fixed. I hope they haven't started blocking something intentionally. Over WAN I cannot say: NO ports seem to be working (even ones I used last week for VNC) which is not EyeTV's fault. In fact I would say it's more of a likelihood than a possibility If the ports weren't independent, it would have to say 'Two 10-Gbps data channels between them' or 'Two 10-Gbps data channels but under full load they're 5-Gbps'īesides, you are aware that the iMac model in the teardown was the 21.5" with one TB port? There's every possibility that the 27" with two TB ports has two TB controllers. � but if it's 'per port' then each port has two 10-Gbps channels� I can't see it getting clearer than that. This entire Thunderbolt hypefest gives the term "vaporware" a whole new definition. Since the teardown shows only one TBolt controller - either the Intel diagram is incomplete (it doesn't show the possibility of a PCIe x8 connection), or the two Imac TBolt ports share the bandwidth of a PCIe x4 connection and cannot simultaneously run all channels at the rated bandwidth. That's not possible with a PCIe x4 link to the controller as is shown in the Intel diagram. I'm looking for a statement that says that each port is independent - so that you get 4 channels (two ports with two channels each) with an aggregate throughput of 40 Gbps (each direction). I saw that - but TBolt has always had two 10-Gbps channels per port.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |